Does radiometric dating prove the earth is old Raw sex chat rooms

These cosmogonies were part of the new emphasis of science in seeking rational explanations of the features of the world. This period was marked by a great deal of field geology rather than grand cosmogonies.It became clear that there had been significant changes in the Earth's topography over time and that these changes could neither be accounted for by natural processes operating during the brief nor by the postulated Noachian flood.

The great debate was won by the uniformitarians, so much so that the degree of gradualism was overstated and the importance of catastrophes was unduly minimized.The modern period has been marked by an enormous expansion of the detailed knowledge of the geological history of the Earth and the processes that have acted during that history.Of course, it is a dangerous practice to extrapolate this trend backward much beyond two centuries.But if the velocity of light was indeed much greater in the past, then light from the most distant stars could have reached earth in possibly a few thousand years and not millions.We cannot know this, but the hard data do raise some questions about dogma in science.

How do we know there is not some physical principle at work here of which science is not yet aware?After rigorous statistical analysis of the data, the conclusion is that there has been an historical decrease in velocity.To be sure, there is scatter in the magnitude of the decrease, but the direction of change is consistently decreasing.The greater the red shift, the greater the speed – and consequently the greater the distance.There are a chain of assumptions here that have been seriously challenged from within the astrophysical fraternity itself.Many authors choose to present the history of a complex subject by breaking it up into major threads and following the history of each thread separately.